- DTN Headline News
Calif. Court Halts Prop 12 Enforcement
By Todd Neeley
Tuesday, January 25, 2022 1:58PM CST

LINCOLN, Neb. (DTN) -- A California court halted the enforcement of Proposition 12 on Monday, moving back enforcement of the animal-welfare law to six months after rules are finalized.

The California Department of Food and Agriculture is more than two years late in finalizing rules for the law that places animal-welfare restrictions on pork producers who sell products in the state.

In addition, the Supreme Court continues to delay a decision on whether to consider a petition on Proposition 12 filed on behalf of the National Pork Producers Council. Though the court issued orders on Monday that included accepting a petition on the Clean Water Act and other cases while denying other petitions, the court did not accept or deny the NPPC challenge.

The Supreme Court's next scheduled conference is set for Feb. 18.

Judge James P. Arguelles, in the Superior Court of California for the county of Sacramento, ordered the delay in enforcement after the California Growers Association, California Retailers Association and the California Restaurant Association said in court filings the industry was given no time to comply with the law because regulations have yet to be completed.

Proposition 12 went into effect on Jan. 1. The law bans the sale of pork from hogs that don't meet the state's new production standards. A federal appeals court upheld the law.

The law requires hog producers to abide by certain regulations to sell pork in California. Voters in the state passed Proposition 12 in 2018 with nearly 63% of voters supporting it. The law forbids the sale of whole pork meat in California from hogs born of sows not housed in conformity with the law. Proposition 12 forbids sows from being confined in such a way that they cannot lie down, stand up, fully extend their limbs, or turn around without touching the sides of their stalls or other animals.

The National Pork Producers Council argued in briefs filed with the Supreme Court that the law violates the Commerce Clause by regulating businesses beyond its borders.

In the California state case, state officials argued in court filings the pork and grocery industries should be subject to penalties if not in compliance with Proposition 12, even if rules for the program have yet to be finalized.

"The state respondents assert that much of the act is clear enough to enforce without additional guidance from" the state, the court said in its ruling.

"To be sure, the square-footage requirements and many of the act's definitions are explicit. Again, the act offers no guidance about the steps sellers must take before they should know that a particular product is traceable to a breeding pig that at some point in the distribution chain was confined in fewer than 24 square feet."

The ag and grocery groups had asked the court for a 28-month delay on enforcement, but the request was denied.

"The court must be mindful of the act's concern about cruel confinements, and the enforcement delay must not exceed a period that is necessary," the court said.

Julie Anna Potts, president and CEO of the North American Meat Institute, said the court's action was necessary.

"Judge Arguelles' decision recognizes the complexity of the pork supply chain and the burdensome and costly provisions of Prop 12," she said in a statement.

"To enforce the law without final regulations leaves the industry unsure of how to comply or what significant changes must be made to provide pork to this critical market."

Read more on DTN:

"Ag Awaits SCOTUS Decisions on Big Cases," https://www.dtnpf.com/…

"Ag Groups Appeal to SCOTUS on Prop 12," https://www.dtnpf.com/…

Todd Neeley can be reached at todd.neeley@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @DTNeeley


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Monday, January 24, 2022 10:03AM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 11:35AM CST
Friday, January 14, 2022 11:00AM CST
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Monday, January 24, 2022 8:26AM CST
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:35PM CST
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:35PM CST
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:59AM CST
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 8:48AM CST
Friday, January 14, 2022 6:49AM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Friday, January 21, 2022 11:01AM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41AM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41AM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Katie Behlinger
Farm Business Editor
Monday, January 24, 2022 12:35PM CST
Saturday, January 1, 2022 4:50AM CST
Saturday, January 1, 2022 4:50AM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:14AM CST
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:56PM CST
Friday, January 14, 2022 8:00AM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Friday, January 21, 2022 4:50PM CST
Friday, December 31, 2021 12:07PM CST
Friday, December 31, 2021 12:07PM CST
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Monday, January 24, 2022 1:53PM CST
Monday, January 10, 2022 2:54PM CST
Monday, January 3, 2022 2:54PM CST
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Friday, January 21, 2022 12:44PM CST
Thursday, January 13, 2022 2:47PM CST
Thursday, January 6, 2022 1:21PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:16PM CST
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:16PM CST
Monday, January 10, 2022 12:38PM CST
Machinery Chatter
Dan Miller
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:10AM CST
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:10AM CST
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:00AM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Tuesday, January 25, 2022 4:08PM CST
Monday, January 24, 2022 4:06PM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 4:06PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Friday, December 31, 2021 3:33PM CST
Friday, November 19, 2021 4:02PM CST
Friday, November 5, 2021 4:55PM CST
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN